Demographics details for Greenville, NC vs Horn lake, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Greenville, NC vs Horn lake, MS.
Data | Greenville | Horn lake |
---|---|---|
Population | 89,233 | 26,550 |
Median Age | 26.9 years | 35.5 years |
Median Income | $47,485 | $57,111 |
Married Families | 24.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 23% | 19% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Greenville vs Horn lake
- In Greenville, the population is higher at 89,233, compared to 26,550 in Horn lake.
- The median age in Horn lake is higher at 35.5 years, compared to 26.9 years in Greenville.
- Horn lake has a higher median income of $57,111, compared to $47,485 in Greenville.
- In Horn lake, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 24.0% in Greenville.
- Greenville has a higher poverty level at 23% compared to 19% in Horn lake.
- The unemployment rate in Greenville is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.7% in Horn lake.
Demographics
Demographics Greenville vs Horn lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Greenville | Horn lake |
---|---|---|
Black | 39 | 45 |
White | 50 | 40 |
Asian | 3 | 1 |
Hispanic | 4 | 9 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Greenville vs Horn lake
- In Horn lake, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 45% compared to 39% in Greenville.
- Greenville has a higher percentage of White residents at 50% compared to 40% in Horn lake.
- The Asian population is larger in Greenville at 3% compared to 1% in Horn lake.
- Horn lake has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 4% in Greenville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Horn lake at 5%, compared to 4% in Greenville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Greenville and Horn lake at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Greenville | Horn lake |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 17.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 12.9% |
Depression | 21.9% | 23.5% |
Smoking | 17.1% | 20.4% |
Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 12.9% |
Obesity | 41.6% | 43.4% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Greenville vs Horn lake
- In Horn lake, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 17.0% in Greenville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Horn lake at 23.5% versus 21.9% in Greenville.
- Horn lake has a higher smoking rate at 20.4% compared to 17.1% in Greenville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Greenville at 14.2% compared to 12.9% in Horn lake.
- Horn lake has higher obesity rates at 43.4% compared to 41.6% in Greenville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Horn lake at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Greenville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Greenville | Horn lake |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (512) | 0.9% (252) |
High School Diploma | 10.3% (9,215) | 18.1% (4,818) |
Less than High School | 4.6% (4,082) | 16.3% (4,319) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.9% (18,672) | 10.5% (2,777) |
Education Levels Comparison: Greenville vs Horn lake
- In Horn lake, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.6% in Greenville.
- In Horn lake, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.1% compared to 10.3% in Greenville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Horn lake at 16.3%, compared to 4.6% in Greenville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Greenville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.9% compared to 10.5% in Horn lake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.