Demographics details for Graysville, AL vs Wauconda, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Graysville, AL vs Wauconda, IL.
| Data | Graysville | Wauconda |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,885 | 13,932 |
| Median Age | 44.3 years | 36.8 years |
| Median Income | $65,671 | $108,229 |
| Married Families | 70.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Graysville vs Wauconda
- The population in Wauconda is higher at 13,932, compared to 1,885 in Graysville.
- Residents in Graysville have a higher median age of 44.3 years compared to 36.8 years in Wauconda.
- Wauconda has a higher median income of $108,229, compared to $65,671 in Graysville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Graysville at 70.0% compared to 43.0% in Wauconda.
- The poverty level is higher in Wauconda at 8%, compared to 0% in Graysville.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Graysville and Wauconda at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Graysville vs Wauconda provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Graysville | Wauconda |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 43 | 1 |
| White | 55 | 66 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 6 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Graysville vs Wauconda
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Graysville at 43% compared to 1% in Wauconda.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Wauconda at 66% compared to 55% in Graysville.
- In Wauconda, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Graysville.
- Wauconda has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 0% in Graysville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Wauconda at 9%, compared to 2% in Graysville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Graysville and Wauconda at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Graysville | Wauconda |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.0% | 9.2% |
| Depression | 24.8% | 18.8% |
| Smoking | 19.6% | 12.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 18.8% |
| Obesity | 38.9% | 31.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 30.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Graysville vs Wauconda
- More residents in Graysville report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 14.2% in Wauconda.
- Depression is more prevalent in Graysville at 24.8% compared to 18.8% in Wauconda.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Graysville at 19.6% compared to 12.7% in Wauconda.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Wauconda at 18.8% compared to 15.8% in Graysville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Graysville at 38.9% compared to 31.0% in Wauconda.
- Disability percentages are higher in Graysville at 30.0% compared to 8.0% in Wauconda.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Graysville | Wauconda |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (50) | 1.4% (202) |
| High School Diploma | 30.4% (573) | 10.5% (1,456) |
| Less than High School | 29.8% (561) | 10.2% (1,425) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.8% (430) | 26.0% (3,623) |
Education Levels Comparison: Graysville vs Wauconda
- A higher percentage of residents in Graysville have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 1.4% in Wauconda.
- A higher percentage of residents in Graysville hold a high school diploma at 30.4% compared to 10.5% in Wauconda.
- More residents in Graysville have less than a high school education at 29.8% compared to 10.2% in Wauconda.
- In Wauconda, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.0% compared to 22.8% in Graysville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.