Demographics details for Graysville, AL vs Carthage, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Graysville, AL vs Carthage, MO.
Data | Graysville | Carthage |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,885 | 15,491 |
Median Age | 44.3 years | 31.6 years |
Median Income | $65,671 | $43,526 |
Married Families | 70.0% | 29.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Graysville vs Carthage
- The population in Carthage is higher at 15,491, compared to 1,885 in Graysville.
- Residents in Graysville have a higher median age of 44.3 years compared to 31.6 years in Carthage.
- Graysville has a higher median income of $65,671 compared to $43,526 in Carthage.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Graysville at 70.0% compared to 29.0% in Carthage.
- The poverty level is higher in Carthage at 14%, compared to 0% in Graysville.
- Carthage has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Graysville.
Demographics
Demographics Graysville vs Carthage provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Graysville | Carthage |
---|---|---|
Black | 43 | 2 |
White | 55 | 52 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 33 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 10 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Graysville vs Carthage
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Graysville at 43% compared to 2% in Carthage.
- Graysville has a higher percentage of White residents at 55% compared to 52% in Carthage.
- In Carthage, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Graysville.
- Carthage has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 33%, compared to 0% in Graysville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Carthage at 10%, compared to 2% in Graysville.
- In Carthage, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Graysville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Graysville | Carthage |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 20.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.0% | 16.0% |
Depression | 24.8% | 26.7% |
Smoking | 19.6% | 24.9% |
Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 15.0% |
Obesity | 38.9% | 42.7% |
Disability Percentage | 30.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Graysville vs Carthage
- In Carthage, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 19.4% in Graysville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Carthage at 26.7% versus 24.8% in Graysville.
- Carthage has a higher smoking rate at 24.9% compared to 19.6% in Graysville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Graysville at 15.8% compared to 15.0% in Carthage.
- Carthage has higher obesity rates at 42.7% compared to 38.9% in Graysville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Graysville at 30.0% compared to 13.0% in Carthage.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Graysville | Carthage |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.7% (50) | 3.7% (576) |
High School Diploma | 30.4% (573) | 13.1% (2,032) |
Less than High School | 29.8% (561) | 30.4% (4,717) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.8% (430) | 12.9% (2,006) |
Education Levels Comparison: Graysville vs Carthage
- In Carthage, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 2.7% in Graysville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Graysville hold a high school diploma at 30.4% compared to 13.1% in Carthage.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Carthage at 30.4%, compared to 29.8% in Graysville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Graysville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.8% compared to 12.9% in Carthage.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.