Demographics details for Girdletree, MD vs Centralia, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Girdletree, MD vs Centralia, IL.

Data Girdletree Centralia
Population 122 11,931
Median Age 57.4 years 40.7 years
Median Income $129,167 $46,468
Married Families 50.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 12%
Unemployment Rate Data is updating 4.5

Population Comparison: Girdletree vs Centralia

  • The population in Centralia is higher at 11,931, compared to 122 in Girdletree.
  • Residents in Girdletree have a higher median age of 57.4 years compared to 40.7 years in Centralia.
  • Girdletree has a higher median income of $129,167 compared to $46,468 in Centralia.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Girdletree at 50.0% compared to 33.0% in Centralia.
  • The poverty level is higher in Centralia at 12%, compared to 0% in Girdletree.
  • Centralia has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 0.0% in Girdletree.

Demographics

Demographics Girdletree vs Centralia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Girdletree Centralia
Black Data is updating 10
White 89 79
Asian 11 2
Hispanic Data is updating 4
Two or More Races Data is updating 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Girdletree vs Centralia

  • In Centralia, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 0% in Girdletree.
  • Girdletree has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 79% in Centralia.
  • The Asian population is larger in Girdletree at 11% compared to 2% in Centralia.
  • Centralia has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 0% in Girdletree.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Centralia at 5%, compared to 0% in Girdletree.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Girdletree and Centralia at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Girdletree Centralia
Mental Health Not Good 16.7% 19.0%
Physical Health Not Good 10.6% 13.8%
Depression 20.8% 23.9%
Smoking 18.7% 22.7%
Binge Drinking 18.8% 16.4%
Obesity 39.6% 41.1%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 22.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Girdletree vs Centralia

  • In Centralia, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 16.7% in Girdletree.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Centralia at 23.9% versus 20.8% in Girdletree.
  • Centralia has a higher smoking rate at 22.7% compared to 18.7% in Girdletree.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Girdletree at 18.8% compared to 16.4% in Centralia.
  • Centralia has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 39.6% in Girdletree.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Centralia at 22.0% compared to 8.0% in Girdletree.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Girdletree Centralia
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.6% (72)
High School Diploma 44.3% (54) 18.8% (2,243)
Less than High School 19.7% (24) 13.7% (1,638)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 5.7% (7) 12.5% (1,494)

Education Levels Comparison: Girdletree vs Centralia

  • In Centralia, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Girdletree.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Girdletree hold a high school diploma at 44.3% compared to 18.8% in Centralia.
  • More residents in Girdletree have less than a high school education at 19.7% compared to 13.7% in Centralia.
  • In Centralia, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.5% compared to 5.7% in Girdletree.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.