Demographics details for Gillette, NJ vs Fremont, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gillette, NJ vs Fremont, CA.
| Data | Gillette | Fremont |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,251 | 223,871 |
| Median Age | 41.0 years | 38.6 years |
| Median Income | $145,000 | $169,023 |
| Married Families | 62.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 2% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Gillette vs Fremont
- The population in Fremont is higher at 223,871, compared to 3,251 in Gillette.
- Residents in Gillette have a higher median age of 41.0 years compared to 38.6 years in Fremont.
- Fremont has a higher median income of $169,023, compared to $145,000 in Gillette.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Gillette at 62.0% compared to 50.0% in Fremont.
- The poverty level is higher in Fremont at 8%, compared to 2% in Gillette.
- Fremont has a higher unemployment rate at 4.4% compared to 3.0% in Gillette.
Demographics
Demographics Gillette vs Fremont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gillette | Fremont |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 3 |
| White | 90 | 15 |
| Asian | 4 | 63 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gillette vs Fremont
- In Fremont, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Gillette.
- Gillette has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 15% in Fremont.
- In Fremont, the Asian population stands at 63%, greater than 4% in Gillette.
- Fremont has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 2% in Gillette.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fremont at 7%, compared to 3% in Gillette.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gillette and Fremont at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gillette | Fremont |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 12.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 7.1% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 14.3% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 7.3% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 14.3% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 20.3% |
| Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gillette vs Fremont
- In Fremont, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 12.1% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fremont at 14.3% versus 0.0% in Gillette.
- Fremont has a higher smoking rate at 7.3% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fremont at 14.3% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
- Fremont has higher obesity rates at 20.3% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fremont at 7.0% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gillette | Fremont |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.4% (3,191) |
| High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 9.7% (21,668) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 7.2% (16,158) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 45.0% (100,683) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gillette vs Fremont
- In Fremont, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
- In Fremont, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 9.7% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fremont at 7.2%, compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
- In Fremont, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.0% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.