Demographics details for Garland, TX vs Westminster, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Garland, TX vs Westminster, CO.
| Data | Garland | Westminster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 240,854 | 114,533 |
| Median Age | 34.4 years | 37.4 years |
| Median Income | $71,044 | $90,651 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Garland vs Westminster
- In Garland, the population is higher at 240,854, compared to 114,533 in Westminster.
- The median age in Westminster is higher at 37.4 years, compared to 34.4 years in Garland.
- Westminster has a higher median income of $90,651, compared to $71,044 in Garland.
- In Westminster, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 39.0% in Garland.
- Garland has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Westminster.
- Westminster has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 4.0% in Garland.
Demographics
Demographics Garland vs Westminster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Garland | Westminster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 16 | 1 |
| White | 6 | 58 |
| Asian | 11 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 45 | 24 |
| Two or More Races | 21 | 11 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Garland vs Westminster
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Garland at 16% compared to 1% in Westminster.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Westminster at 58% compared to 6% in Garland.
- The Asian population is larger in Garland at 11% compared to 5% in Westminster.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Garland at 45% compared to 24% in Westminster.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Garland at 21% compared to 11% in Westminster.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Garland and Westminster at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Garland | Westminster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 21.1% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 13.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 21.5% |
| Obesity | 33.9% | 26.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Garland vs Westminster
- More residents in Garland report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 14.2% in Westminster.
- Depression is more prevalent in Garland at 22.2% compared to 21.1% in Westminster.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Garland at 17.2% compared to 13.5% in Westminster.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Westminster at 21.5% compared to 17.6% in Garland.
- Obesity rates are higher in Garland at 33.9% compared to 26.9% in Westminster.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Westminster at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Garland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Garland | Westminster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.5% (6,080) | 0.9% (1,007) |
| High School Diploma | 13.9% (33,524) | 11.9% (13,626) |
| Less than High School | 24.7% (59,406) | 10.3% (11,853) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.5% (37,249) | 30.3% (34,676) |
Education Levels Comparison: Garland vs Westminster
- A higher percentage of residents in Garland have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.9% in Westminster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Garland hold a high school diploma at 13.9% compared to 11.9% in Westminster.
- More residents in Garland have less than a high school education at 24.7% compared to 10.3% in Westminster.
- In Westminster, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.3% compared to 15.5% in Garland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.