Demographics details for Garland, TX vs Sylvania, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Garland, TX vs Sylvania, GA.
| Data | Garland | Sylvania |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 240,854 | 2,602 |
| Median Age | 34.4 years | 43.7 years |
| Median Income | $71,044 | $36,682 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Garland vs Sylvania
- In Garland, the population is higher at 240,854, compared to 2,602 in Sylvania.
- The median age in Sylvania is higher at 43.7 years, compared to 34.4 years in Garland.
- Garland has a higher median income of $71,044 compared to $36,682 in Sylvania.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Garland at 39.0% compared to 33.0% in Sylvania.
- The poverty level is higher in Sylvania at 18%, compared to 12% in Garland.
- Sylvania has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.0% in Garland.
Demographics
Demographics Garland vs Sylvania provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Garland | Sylvania |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 16 | 57 |
| White | 6 | 40 |
| Asian | 11 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 45 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 21 | 2 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Garland vs Sylvania
- In Sylvania, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 57% compared to 16% in Garland.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sylvania at 40% compared to 6% in Garland.
- The Asian population is larger in Garland at 11% compared to 0% in Sylvania.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Garland at 45% compared to 1% in Sylvania.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Garland at 21% compared to 2% in Sylvania.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Garland at 1% compared to 0% in Sylvania.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Garland | Sylvania |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 14.4% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 21.8% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 21.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | 33.9% | 40.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Garland vs Sylvania
- In Sylvania, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 17.1% in Garland.
- Depression is more prevalent in Garland at 22.2% compared to 21.8% in Sylvania.
- Sylvania has a higher smoking rate at 21.8% compared to 17.2% in Garland.
- Binge drinking is more common in Garland at 17.6% compared to 13.6% in Sylvania.
- Sylvania has higher obesity rates at 40.5% compared to 33.9% in Garland.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sylvania at 16.0% compared to 9.0% in Garland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Garland | Sylvania |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.5% (6,080) | 0.3% (8) |
| High School Diploma | 13.9% (33,524) | 27.1% (704) |
| Less than High School | 24.7% (59,406) | 18.6% (485) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.5% (37,249) | 10.4% (271) |
Education Levels Comparison: Garland vs Sylvania
- A higher percentage of residents in Garland have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.3% in Sylvania.
- In Sylvania, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.1% compared to 13.9% in Garland.
- More residents in Garland have less than a high school education at 24.7% compared to 18.6% in Sylvania.
- A higher percentage of residents in Garland hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 10.4% in Sylvania.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.