Demographics details for Freeport, MN vs Central city, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Freeport, MN vs Central city, KY.
| Data | Freeport | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 677 | 5,810 |
| Median Age | 29.9 years | 33.5 years |
| Median Income | $91,250 | $52,184 |
| Married Families | 53.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Freeport vs Central city
- The population in Central city is higher at 5,810, compared to 677 in Freeport.
- The median age in Central city is higher at 33.5 years, compared to 29.9 years in Freeport.
- Freeport has a higher median income of $91,250 compared to $52,184 in Central city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Freeport at 53.0% compared to 38.0% in Central city.
- The poverty level is higher in Central city at 16%, compared to 5% in Freeport.
- Central city has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.5% in Freeport.
Demographics
Demographics Freeport vs Central city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Freeport | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 3 |
| White | 82 | 88 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 12 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Freeport vs Central city
- In Central city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in Freeport.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Central city at 88% compared to 82% in Freeport.
- Both Freeport and Central city have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Freeport at 12% compared to 2% in Central city.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Central city at 6%, compared to 4% in Freeport.
- In Central city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Freeport.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Freeport | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.3% | 15.5% |
| Depression | 23.7% | 26.8% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 24.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.3% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 39.9% | 41.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Freeport vs Central city
- In Central city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 15.0% in Freeport.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Central city at 26.8% versus 23.7% in Freeport.
- Central city has a higher smoking rate at 24.8% compared to 17.2% in Freeport.
- Binge drinking is more common in Freeport at 23.3% compared to 14.8% in Central city.
- Central city has higher obesity rates at 41.9% compared to 39.9% in Freeport.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Central city at 15.0% compared to 6.0% in Freeport.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Freeport | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (2) | 1.1% (65) |
| High School Diploma | 19.9% (135) | 15.4% (897) |
| Less than High School | 9.2% (62) | 15.6% (905) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.4% (118) | 8.3% (480) |
Education Levels Comparison: Freeport vs Central city
- In Central city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.3% in Freeport.
- A higher percentage of residents in Freeport hold a high school diploma at 19.9% compared to 15.4% in Central city.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Central city at 15.6%, compared to 9.2% in Freeport.
- A higher percentage of residents in Freeport hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 8.3% in Central city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.