Demographics details for Fort valley, GA vs Kosciusko, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort valley, GA vs Kosciusko, MS.
Data | Fort valley | Kosciusko |
---|---|---|
Population | 8,838 | 6,922 |
Median Age | 30.6 years | 36.2 years |
Median Income | $31,807 | $33,719 |
Married Families | 18.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | 25% | 22% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Fort valley vs Kosciusko
- In Fort valley, the population is higher at 8,838, compared to 6,922 in Kosciusko.
- The median age in Kosciusko is higher at 36.2 years, compared to 30.6 years in Fort valley.
- Kosciusko has a higher median income of $33,719, compared to $31,807 in Fort valley.
- In Kosciusko, the percentage of married families is higher at 25.0%, compared to 18.0% in Fort valley.
- Fort valley has a higher poverty level at 25% compared to 22% in Kosciusko.
- Kosciusko has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 4.5% in Fort valley.
Demographics
Demographics Fort valley vs Kosciusko provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fort valley | Kosciusko |
---|---|---|
Black | 70 | 53 |
White | 18 | 42 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 8 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort valley vs Kosciusko
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort valley at 70% compared to 53% in Kosciusko.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Kosciusko at 42% compared to 18% in Fort valley.
- Both Fort valley and Kosciusko have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fort valley at 8% compared to 2% in Kosciusko.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fort valley at 4% compared to 3% in Kosciusko.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort valley and Kosciusko at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fort valley | Kosciusko |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 19.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.5% | 16.2% |
Depression | 19.5% | 22.8% |
Smoking | 22.3% | 26.1% |
Binge Drinking | 11.8% | 11.3% |
Obesity | 46.2% | 46.0% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort valley vs Kosciusko
- In Kosciusko, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 19.2% in Fort valley.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Kosciusko at 22.8% versus 19.5% in Fort valley.
- Kosciusko has a higher smoking rate at 26.1% compared to 22.3% in Fort valley.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort valley at 11.8% compared to 11.3% in Kosciusko.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fort valley at 46.2% compared to 46.0% in Kosciusko.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Kosciusko at 18.0% compared to 16.0% in Fort valley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fort valley | Kosciusko |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.0% (267) | 0.6% (39) |
High School Diploma | 13.9% (1,226) | 18.4% (1,276) |
Less than High School | 17.3% (1,527) | 9.0% (624) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.8% (954) | 12.8% (886) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort valley vs Kosciusko
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort valley have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.6% in Kosciusko.
- In Kosciusko, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.4% compared to 13.9% in Fort valley.
- More residents in Fort valley have less than a high school education at 17.3% compared to 9.0% in Kosciusko.
- In Kosciusko, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.8% compared to 10.8% in Fort valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.