Demographics details for Fort thomas, KY vs Union, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort thomas, KY vs Union, OR.
| Data | Fort thomas | Union |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,133 | 26,177 |
| Median Age | 37.9 years | 39.7 years |
| Median Income | $95,391 | $61,946 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Fort thomas vs Union
- The population in Union is higher at 26,177, compared to 17,133 in Fort thomas.
- The median age in Union is higher at 39.7 years, compared to 37.9 years in Fort thomas.
- Fort thomas has a higher median income of $95,391 compared to $61,946 in Union.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort thomas at 45.0% compared to 42.0% in Union.
- The poverty level is higher in Union at 11%, compared to 6% in Fort thomas.
- Union has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.0% in Fort thomas.
Demographics
Demographics Fort thomas vs Union provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort thomas | Union |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 92 | 88 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fort thomas vs Union
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort thomas at 2% compared to 1% in Union.
- Fort thomas has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 88% in Union.
- Both Fort thomas and Union have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Union has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 1% in Fort thomas.
- Both Fort thomas and Union have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- In Union, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fort thomas.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort thomas | Union |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 18.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 26.2% | 27.8% |
| Smoking | 13.6% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 32.4% | 35.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort thomas vs Union
- In Union, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 15.5% in Fort thomas.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Union at 27.8% versus 26.2% in Fort thomas.
- Union has a higher smoking rate at 17.0% compared to 13.6% in Fort thomas.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Union at 17.8% compared to 17.1% in Fort thomas.
- Union has higher obesity rates at 35.4% compared to 32.4% in Fort thomas.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Union at 17.0% compared to 10.0% in Fort thomas.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort thomas | Union |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (66) | 0.6% (146) |
| High School Diploma | 10.7% (1,840) | 18.6% (4,878) |
| Less than High School | 3.3% (569) | 9.1% (2,380) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 37.3% (6,383) | 16.0% (4,194) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort thomas vs Union
- In Union, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Fort thomas.
- In Union, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.6% compared to 10.7% in Fort thomas.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Union at 9.1%, compared to 3.3% in Fort thomas.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort thomas hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.3% compared to 16.0% in Union.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.