Demographics details for Fishers, IN vs Powder springs, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fishers, IN vs Powder springs, GA.

Data Fishers Powder springs
Population 101,966 17,337
Median Age 37.1 years 38.7 years
Median Income $126,548 $88,311
Married Families 47.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 5% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Fishers vs Powder springs

  • In Fishers, the population is higher at 101,966, compared to 17,337 in Powder springs.
  • The median age in Powder springs is higher at 38.7 years, compared to 37.1 years in Fishers.
  • Fishers has a higher median income of $126,548 compared to $88,311 in Powder springs.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fishers at 47.0% compared to 36.0% in Powder springs.
  • The poverty level is higher in Powder springs at 12%, compared to 5% in Fishers.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Fishers and Powder springs at 3.5%.

Demographics

Demographics Fishers vs Powder springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fishers Powder springs
Black 5 51
White 80 22
Asian 8 2
Hispanic 3 19
Two or More Races 4 5
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Fishers vs Powder springs

  • In Powder springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 51% compared to 5% in Fishers.
  • Fishers has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 22% in Powder springs.
  • The Asian population is larger in Fishers at 8% compared to 2% in Powder springs.
  • Powder springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 3% in Fishers.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Powder springs at 5%, compared to 4% in Fishers.
  • In Powder springs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fishers.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fishers Powder springs
Mental Health Not Good 12.5% 15.0%
Physical Health Not Good 7.1% 10.7%
Depression 22.2% 17.7%
Smoking 9.4% 14.4%
Binge Drinking 17.0% 14.4%
Obesity 27.8% 33.0%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fishers vs Powder springs

  • In Powder springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.0% compared to 12.5% in Fishers.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Fishers at 22.2% compared to 17.7% in Powder springs.
  • Powder springs has a higher smoking rate at 14.4% compared to 9.4% in Fishers.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fishers at 17.0% compared to 14.4% in Powder springs.
  • Powder springs has higher obesity rates at 33.0% compared to 27.8% in Fishers.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Powder springs at 11.0% compared to 7.0% in Fishers.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fishers Powder springs
No Schooling 0.4% (418) 1.3% (225)
High School Diploma 6.5% (6,652) 15.0% (2,598)
Less than High School 2.0% (2,037) 7.6% (1,309)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 41.2% (42,051) 26.3% (4,561)

Education Levels Comparison: Fishers vs Powder springs

  • In Powder springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.4% in Fishers.
  • In Powder springs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.0% compared to 6.5% in Fishers.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Powder springs at 7.6%, compared to 2.0% in Fishers.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fishers hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.2% compared to 26.3% in Powder springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.