Demographics details for Earlham, IA vs Lake city, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Earlham, IA vs Lake city, FL.
| Data | Earlham | Lake city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,423 | 12,449 |
| Median Age | 41.1 years | 37.9 years |
| Median Income | $103,977 | $46,172 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Earlham vs Lake city
- The population in Lake city is higher at 12,449, compared to 1,423 in Earlham.
- Residents in Earlham have a higher median age of 41.1 years compared to 37.9 years in Lake city.
- Earlham has a higher median income of $103,977 compared to $46,172 in Lake city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Earlham at 45.0% compared to 26.0% in Lake city.
- The poverty level is higher in Lake city at 14%, compared to 5% in Earlham.
- The unemployment rate in Earlham is higher at 3.2%, compared to 3.0% in Lake city.
Demographics
Demographics Earlham vs Lake city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Earlham | Lake city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 36 |
| White | 95 | 53 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Earlham vs Lake city
- In Lake city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 36% compared to 2% in Earlham.
- Earlham has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 53% in Lake city.
- In Lake city, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Earlham.
- Lake city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 1% in Earlham.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lake city at 7%, compared to 2% in Earlham.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Earlham and Lake city at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Earlham | Lake city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 13.4% |
| Depression | 18.4% | 21.0% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | 23.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.0% | 14.5% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 36.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Earlham vs Lake city
- In Lake city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 14.4% in Earlham.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lake city at 21.0% versus 18.4% in Earlham.
- Lake city has a higher smoking rate at 23.6% compared to 14.6% in Earlham.
- Binge drinking is more common in Earlham at 23.0% compared to 14.5% in Lake city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Earlham at 37.3% compared to 36.5% in Lake city.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lake city at 17.0% compared to 10.0% in Earlham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Earlham | Lake city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (10) | 0.3% (42) |
| High School Diploma | 13.8% (197) | 19.5% (2,424) |
| Less than High School | 6.0% (85) | 8.8% (1,093) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.0% (242) | 15.5% (1,932) |
Education Levels Comparison: Earlham vs Lake city
- A higher percentage of residents in Earlham have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.3% in Lake city.
- In Lake city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.5% compared to 13.8% in Earlham.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lake city at 8.8%, compared to 6.0% in Earlham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Earlham hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.0% compared to 15.5% in Lake city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.