Demographics details for Dardanelle, AR vs Massapequa park, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Dardanelle, AR vs Massapequa park, NY.

Data Dardanelle Massapequa park
Population 4,518 16,873
Median Age 37.9 years 43.7 years
Median Income $47,724 $161,193
Married Families 41.0% 52.0%
Poverty Level 19% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 5.7 3.5

Population Comparison: Dardanelle vs Massapequa park

  • The population in Massapequa park is higher at 16,873, compared to 4,518 in Dardanelle.
  • The median age in Massapequa park is higher at 43.7 years, compared to 37.9 years in Dardanelle.
  • Massapequa park has a higher median income of $161,193, compared to $47,724 in Dardanelle.
  • In Massapequa park, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 41.0% in Dardanelle.
  • Dardanelle has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 0% in Massapequa park.
  • The unemployment rate in Dardanelle is higher at 5.7%, compared to 3.5% in Massapequa park.

Demographics

Demographics Dardanelle vs Massapequa park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Dardanelle Massapequa park
Black 8 1
White 50 88
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic 40 5
Two or More Races 2 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Dardanelle vs Massapequa park

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Dardanelle at 8% compared to 1% in Massapequa park.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Massapequa park at 88% compared to 50% in Dardanelle.
  • In Massapequa park, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Dardanelle.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Dardanelle at 40% compared to 5% in Massapequa park.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Massapequa park at 4%, compared to 2% in Dardanelle.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Dardanelle and Massapequa park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Dardanelle Massapequa park
Mental Health Not Good 19.2% 13.7%
Physical Health Not Good 14.9% 8.0%
Depression 26.3% 17.9%
Smoking 22.1% 11.5%
Binge Drinking 14.0% 19.2%
Obesity 37.5% 26.4%
Disability Percentage 21.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Dardanelle vs Massapequa park

  • More residents in Dardanelle report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 13.7% in Massapequa park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Dardanelle at 26.3% compared to 17.9% in Massapequa park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Dardanelle at 22.1% compared to 11.5% in Massapequa park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Massapequa park at 19.2% compared to 14.0% in Dardanelle.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Dardanelle at 37.5% compared to 26.4% in Massapequa park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Dardanelle at 21.0% compared to 9.0% in Massapequa park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Dardanelle Massapequa park
No Schooling 2.1% (94) 0.3% (45)
High School Diploma 16.5% (745) 15.3% (2,586)
Less than High School 36.0% (1,626) 3.8% (641)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 7.7% (346) 36.6% (6,183)

Education Levels Comparison: Dardanelle vs Massapequa park

  • A higher percentage of residents in Dardanelle have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.3% in Massapequa park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Dardanelle hold a high school diploma at 16.5% compared to 15.3% in Massapequa park.
  • More residents in Dardanelle have less than a high school education at 36.0% compared to 3.8% in Massapequa park.
  • In Massapequa park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.6% compared to 7.7% in Dardanelle.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.