Demographics details for Curwensville, PA vs Baldwin park, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Curwensville, PA vs Baldwin park, CA.

Data Curwensville Baldwin park
Population 2,532 69,455
Median Age 38.9 years 37.1 years
Median Income $46,726 $76,002
Married Families 33.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 12% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 6.3

Population Comparison: Curwensville vs Baldwin park

  • The population in Baldwin park is higher at 69,455, compared to 2,532 in Curwensville.
  • Residents in Curwensville have a higher median age of 38.9 years compared to 37.1 years in Baldwin park.
  • Baldwin park has a higher median income of $76,002, compared to $46,726 in Curwensville.
  • In Baldwin park, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 33.0% in Curwensville.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Curwensville and Baldwin park at 12%.
  • Baldwin park has a higher unemployment rate at 6.3% compared to 4.2% in Curwensville.

Demographics

Demographics Curwensville vs Baldwin park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Curwensville Baldwin park
Black 1 1
White 95 -25
Asian Data is updating 23
Hispanic 1 75
Two or More Races 3 23
American Indian Data is updating 3

Demographics Comparison: Curwensville vs Baldwin park

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Curwensville and Baldwin park at 1%.
  • Curwensville has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to -25% in Baldwin park.
  • In Baldwin park, the Asian population stands at 23%, greater than 0% in Curwensville.
  • Baldwin park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 75%, compared to 1% in Curwensville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Baldwin park at 23%, compared to 3% in Curwensville.
  • In Baldwin park, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Curwensville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Curwensville Baldwin park
Mental Health Not Good 18.4% 15.4%
Physical Health Not Good 12.5% 12.7%
Depression 23.9% 14.7%
Smoking 21.6% 11.4%
Binge Drinking 18.4% 14.2%
Obesity 37.1% 29.9%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Curwensville vs Baldwin park

  • More residents in Curwensville report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 15.4% in Baldwin park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Curwensville at 23.9% compared to 14.7% in Baldwin park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Curwensville at 21.6% compared to 11.4% in Baldwin park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Curwensville at 18.4% compared to 14.2% in Baldwin park.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Curwensville at 37.1% compared to 29.9% in Baldwin park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Curwensville at 18.0% compared to 10.0% in Baldwin park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Curwensville Baldwin park
No Schooling 0.5% (12) 5.5% (3,853)
High School Diploma 28.4% (720) 18.1% (12,587)
Less than High School 10.5% (266) 41.7% (28,939)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.8% (451) 9.8% (6,787)

Education Levels Comparison: Curwensville vs Baldwin park

  • In Baldwin park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 5.5% compared to 0.5% in Curwensville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Curwensville hold a high school diploma at 28.4% compared to 18.1% in Baldwin park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Baldwin park at 41.7%, compared to 10.5% in Curwensville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Curwensville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.8% compared to 9.8% in Baldwin park.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.