Demographics details for Cullman, AL vs Richardson, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cullman, AL vs Richardson, TX.
| Data | Cullman | Richardson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,251 | 118,802 |
| Median Age | 42.0 years | 34.5 years |
| Median Income | $59,982 | $94,362 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Cullman vs Richardson
- The population in Richardson is higher at 118,802, compared to 19,251 in Cullman.
- Residents in Cullman have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 34.5 years in Richardson.
- Richardson has a higher median income of $94,362, compared to $59,982 in Cullman.
- In Richardson, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 39.0% in Cullman.
- Cullman has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 6% in Richardson.
- The unemployment rate in Cullman is higher at 4.3%, compared to 3.9% in Richardson.
Demographics
Demographics Cullman vs Richardson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cullman | Richardson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 12 |
| White | 92 | 49 |
| Asian | 1 | 15 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cullman vs Richardson
- In Richardson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 1% in Cullman.
- Cullman has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 49% in Richardson.
- In Richardson, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 1% in Cullman.
- Richardson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 2% in Cullman.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Richardson at 7%, compared to 4% in Cullman.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cullman and Richardson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cullman | Richardson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 14.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 8.9% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 20.9% |
| Smoking | 18.2% | 11.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 18.3% |
| Obesity | 37.5% | 28.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cullman vs Richardson
- More residents in Cullman report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 14.4% in Richardson.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cullman at 24.9% compared to 20.9% in Richardson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cullman at 18.2% compared to 11.8% in Richardson.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Richardson at 18.3% compared to 16.4% in Cullman.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cullman at 37.5% compared to 28.2% in Richardson.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cullman at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Richardson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cullman | Richardson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (130) | 1.4% (1,646) |
| High School Diploma | 13.6% (2,614) | 6.8% (8,041) |
| Less than High School | 13.0% (2,512) | 8.4% (10,002) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.1% (4,253) | 36.7% (43,584) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cullman vs Richardson
- In Richardson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.7% in Cullman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cullman hold a high school diploma at 13.6% compared to 6.8% in Richardson.
- More residents in Cullman have less than a high school education at 13.0% compared to 8.4% in Richardson.
- In Richardson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.7% compared to 22.1% in Cullman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.