Demographics details for Crescent, PA vs Richardson, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Crescent, PA vs Richardson, TX.
Data | Crescent | Richardson |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,455 | 118,802 |
Median Age | 50.8 years | 34.5 years |
Median Income | $76,116 | $94,362 |
Married Families | 49.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 4% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Crescent vs Richardson
- The population in Richardson is higher at 118,802, compared to 2,455 in Crescent.
- Residents in Crescent have a higher median age of 50.8 years compared to 34.5 years in Richardson.
- Richardson has a higher median income of $94,362, compared to $76,116 in Crescent.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Crescent at 49.0% compared to 41.0% in Richardson.
- The poverty level is higher in Richardson at 6%, compared to 4% in Crescent.
- Richardson has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.5% in Crescent.
Demographics
Demographics Crescent vs Richardson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Crescent | Richardson |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 12 |
White | 92 | 49 |
Asian | 3 | 15 |
Hispanic | 3 | 17 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Crescent vs Richardson
- In Richardson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 1% in Crescent.
- Crescent has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 49% in Richardson.
- In Richardson, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 3% in Crescent.
- Richardson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 3% in Crescent.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Richardson at 7%, compared to 1% in Crescent.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Crescent and Richardson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Crescent | Richardson |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 14.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 8.9% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 20.9% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 11.8% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 18.3% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 28.2% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Crescent vs Richardson
- In Richardson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.4% compared to 0.0% in Crescent.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Richardson at 20.9% versus 0.0% in Crescent.
- Richardson has a higher smoking rate at 11.8% compared to 0.0% in Crescent.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Richardson at 18.3% compared to 0.0% in Crescent.
- Richardson has higher obesity rates at 28.2% compared to 0.0% in Crescent.
- Disability percentages are higher in Crescent at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Richardson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Crescent | Richardson |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (27) | 1.4% (1,646) |
High School Diploma | 18.3% (449) | 6.8% (8,041) |
Less than High School | 10.8% (264) | 8.4% (10,002) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.8% (487) | 36.7% (43,584) |
Education Levels Comparison: Crescent vs Richardson
- In Richardson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.1% in Crescent.
- A higher percentage of residents in Crescent hold a high school diploma at 18.3% compared to 6.8% in Richardson.
- More residents in Crescent have less than a high school education at 10.8% compared to 8.4% in Richardson.
- In Richardson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.7% compared to 19.8% in Crescent.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.