Demographics details for Coral gables, FL vs Sugar grove, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Coral gables, FL vs Sugar grove, PA.

Data Coral gables Sugar grove
Population 49,193 546
Median Age 39.3 years 42.2 years
Median Income $118,203 $68,056
Married Families 39.0% 53.0%
Poverty Level 6% 8%
Unemployment Rate 2.7 4.2

Population Comparison: Coral gables vs Sugar grove

  • In Coral gables, the population is higher at 49,193, compared to 546 in Sugar grove.
  • The median age in Sugar grove is higher at 42.2 years, compared to 39.3 years in Coral gables.
  • Coral gables has a higher median income of $118,203 compared to $68,056 in Sugar grove.
  • In Sugar grove, the percentage of married families is higher at 53.0%, compared to 39.0% in Coral gables.
  • The poverty level is higher in Sugar grove at 8%, compared to 6% in Coral gables.
  • Sugar grove has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 2.7% in Coral gables.

Demographics

Demographics Coral gables vs Sugar grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Coral gables Sugar grove
Black 4 1
White 6 79
Asian 4 Data is updating
Hispanic 58 6
Two or More Races 28 14
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Coral gables vs Sugar grove

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Coral gables at 4% compared to 1% in Sugar grove.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Sugar grove at 79% compared to 6% in Coral gables.
  • The Asian population is larger in Coral gables at 4% compared to 0% in Sugar grove.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Coral gables at 58% compared to 6% in Sugar grove.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Coral gables at 28% compared to 14% in Sugar grove.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Coral gables and Sugar grove at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Coral gables Sugar grove
Mental Health Not Good 13.0% 18.3%
Physical Health Not Good 7.7% 13.2%
Depression 14.6% 23.5%
Smoking 9.4% 22.8%
Binge Drinking 15.5% 18.2%
Obesity 23.8% 38.8%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Coral gables vs Sugar grove

  • In Sugar grove, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 13.0% in Coral gables.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Sugar grove at 23.5% versus 14.6% in Coral gables.
  • Sugar grove has a higher smoking rate at 22.8% compared to 9.4% in Coral gables.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Sugar grove at 18.2% compared to 15.5% in Coral gables.
  • Sugar grove has higher obesity rates at 38.8% compared to 23.8% in Coral gables.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sugar grove at 10.0% compared to 8.0% in Coral gables.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Coral gables Sugar grove
No Schooling 0.4% (195) 1.5% (8)
High School Diploma 5.4% (2,681) 28.2% (154)
Less than High School 3.8% (1,890) 6.2% (34)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 45.6% (22,440) 13.0% (71)

Education Levels Comparison: Coral gables vs Sugar grove

  • In Sugar grove, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.4% in Coral gables.
  • In Sugar grove, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.2% compared to 5.4% in Coral gables.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sugar grove at 6.2%, compared to 3.8% in Coral gables.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Coral gables hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.6% compared to 13.0% in Sugar grove.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.