Demographics details for Conshohocken, PA vs Farson, WY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Conshohocken, PA vs Farson, WY.
| Data | Conshohocken | Farson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,255 | 217 |
| Median Age | 32.3 years | 44.5 years |
| Median Income | $114,523 | $42,721 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 19.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Conshohocken vs Farson
- In Conshohocken, the population is higher at 9,255, compared to 217 in Farson.
- The median age in Farson is higher at 44.5 years, compared to 32.3 years in Conshohocken.
- Conshohocken has a higher median income of $114,523 compared to $42,721 in Farson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Conshohocken at 39.0% compared to 19.0% in Farson.
- The poverty level is higher in Farson at 10%, compared to 5% in Conshohocken.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Conshohocken and Farson at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Conshohocken vs Farson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Conshohocken | Farson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | Data is updating |
| White | 86 | 100 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 4 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Conshohocken vs Farson
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Conshohocken at 5% compared to 0% in Farson.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Farson at 100% compared to 86% in Conshohocken.
- The Asian population is larger in Conshohocken at 3% compared to 0% in Farson.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Conshohocken at 2% compared to 0% in Farson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Conshohocken at 4% compared to 0% in Farson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Conshohocken and Farson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Conshohocken | Farson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 15.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | 9.9% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 20.3% |
| Smoking | 11.6% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.4% | 19.0% |
| Obesity | 30.2% | 32.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Conshohocken vs Farson
- In Farson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 13.8% in Conshohocken.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Farson at 20.3% versus 20.1% in Conshohocken.
- Farson has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 11.6% in Conshohocken.
- Binge drinking is more common in Conshohocken at 19.4% compared to 19.0% in Farson.
- Farson has higher obesity rates at 32.5% compared to 30.2% in Conshohocken.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Farson at 13.0% compared to 8.0% in Conshohocken.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Conshohocken | Farson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (26) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 14.0% (1,292) | 13.8% (30) |
| Less than High School | 4.2% (388) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 50.2% (4,643) | 16.1% (35) |
Education Levels Comparison: Conshohocken vs Farson
- A higher percentage of residents in Conshohocken have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Farson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Conshohocken hold a high school diploma at 14.0% compared to 13.8% in Farson.
- More residents in Conshohocken have less than a high school education at 4.2% compared to 0.0% in Farson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Conshohocken hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 50.2% compared to 16.1% in Farson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.