Demographics details for Cleveland, GA vs Laconia, NH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cleveland, GA vs Laconia, NH.
| Data | Cleveland | Laconia |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,548 | 17,086 |
| Median Age | 39.6 years | 43.7 years |
| Median Income | $46,994 | $67,856 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.4 |
Population Comparison: Cleveland vs Laconia
- The population in Laconia is higher at 17,086, compared to 3,548 in Cleveland.
- The median age in Laconia is higher at 43.7 years, compared to 39.6 years in Cleveland.
- Laconia has a higher median income of $67,856, compared to $46,994 in Cleveland.
- In Laconia, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 25.0% in Cleveland.
- Cleveland has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Laconia.
- The unemployment rate in Cleveland is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.4% in Laconia.
Demographics
Demographics Cleveland vs Laconia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cleveland | Laconia |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 1 |
| White | 84 | 93 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cleveland vs Laconia
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cleveland at 5% compared to 1% in Laconia.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Laconia at 93% compared to 84% in Cleveland.
- The Asian population is larger in Cleveland at 2% compared to 1% in Laconia.
- Laconia has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 2% in Cleveland.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cleveland at 7% compared to 2% in Laconia.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cleveland and Laconia at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cleveland | Laconia |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.8% | 10.5% |
| Depression | 24.2% | 24.9% |
| Smoking | 18.9% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 16.6% |
| Obesity | 33.2% | 31.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cleveland vs Laconia
- More residents in Cleveland report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 16.9% in Laconia.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Laconia at 24.9% versus 24.2% in Cleveland.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cleveland at 18.9% compared to 17.2% in Laconia.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Laconia at 16.6% compared to 16.2% in Cleveland.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cleveland at 33.2% compared to 31.5% in Laconia.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Laconia at 18.0% compared to 17.0% in Cleveland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cleveland | Laconia |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (30) | 0.4% (61) |
| High School Diploma | 18.5% (656) | 18.9% (3,229) |
| Less than High School | 15.4% (545) | 12.6% (2,158) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.2% (362) | 19.7% (3,364) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cleveland vs Laconia
- A higher percentage of residents in Cleveland have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.4% in Laconia.
- In Laconia, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.9% compared to 18.5% in Cleveland.
- More residents in Cleveland have less than a high school education at 15.4% compared to 12.6% in Laconia.
- In Laconia, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.7% compared to 10.2% in Cleveland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.