Demographics details for Clearfield, UT vs Franklin, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clearfield, UT vs Franklin, TX.
Data | Clearfield | Franklin |
---|---|---|
Population | 34,062 | 10,618 |
Median Age | 29.8 years | 42.9 years |
Median Income | $69,889 | $67,915 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Clearfield vs Franklin
- In Clearfield, the population is higher at 34,062, compared to 10,618 in Franklin.
- The median age in Franklin is higher at 42.9 years, compared to 29.8 years in Clearfield.
- Clearfield has a higher median income of $69,889 compared to $67,915 in Franklin.
- In Franklin, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 37.0% in Clearfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Franklin at 12%, compared to 10% in Clearfield.
- Franklin has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 4.3% in Clearfield.
Demographics
Demographics Clearfield vs Franklin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Clearfield | Franklin |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 4 |
White | 69 | 69 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 17 | 15 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 12 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clearfield vs Franklin
- In Franklin, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 3% in Clearfield.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Clearfield and Franklin at 69%.
- The Asian population is larger in Clearfield at 2% compared to 0% in Franklin.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clearfield at 17% compared to 15% in Franklin.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Franklin at 12%, compared to 8% in Clearfield.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Clearfield at 1% compared to 0% in Franklin.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Clearfield | Franklin |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 16.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 10.3% |
Depression | 24.6% | 23.5% |
Smoking | 10.2% | 14.8% |
Binge Drinking | 10.2% | 19.8% |
Obesity | 36.3% | 33.2% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clearfield vs Franklin
- More residents in Clearfield report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 16.3% in Franklin.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clearfield at 24.6% compared to 23.5% in Franklin.
- Franklin has a higher smoking rate at 14.8% compared to 10.2% in Clearfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Franklin at 19.8% compared to 10.2% in Clearfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clearfield at 36.3% compared to 33.2% in Franklin.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Franklin at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Clearfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Clearfield | Franklin |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (208) | 0.5% (51) |
High School Diploma | 13.8% (4,690) | 15.0% (1,588) |
Less than High School | 10.7% (3,633) | 11.3% (1,197) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (4,366) | 21.2% (2,251) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clearfield vs Franklin
- A higher percentage of residents in Clearfield have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Franklin.
- In Franklin, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.0% compared to 13.8% in Clearfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Franklin at 11.3%, compared to 10.7% in Clearfield.
- In Franklin, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 12.8% in Clearfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.