Demographics details for Chula vista, CA vs Clayton, OK

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Chula vista, CA vs Clayton, OK.

Data Chula vista Clayton
Population 279,170 555
Median Age 36.1 years 32.7 years
Median Income $101,984 $27,083
Married Families 39.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level 12% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 4.8 3.5

Population Comparison: Chula vista vs Clayton

  • In Chula vista, the population is higher at 279,170, compared to 555 in Clayton.
  • Residents in Chula vista have a higher median age of 36.1 years compared to 32.7 years in Clayton.
  • Chula vista has a higher median income of $101,984 compared to $27,083 in Clayton.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Chula vista at 39.0% compared to 31.0% in Clayton.
  • Chula vista has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Clayton.
  • The unemployment rate in Chula vista is higher at 4.8%, compared to 3.5% in Clayton.

Demographics

Demographics Chula vista vs Clayton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Chula vista Clayton
Black 5 2
White -4 51
Asian 15 Data is updating
Hispanic 60 4
Two or More Races 23 23
American Indian 1 20

Demographics Comparison: Chula vista vs Clayton

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chula vista at 5% compared to 2% in Clayton.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Clayton at 51% compared to -4% in Chula vista.
  • The Asian population is larger in Chula vista at 15% compared to 0% in Clayton.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Chula vista at 60% compared to 4% in Clayton.
  • Both Chula vista and Clayton have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 23%.
  • In Clayton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 20%, compared to 1% in Chula vista.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Chula vista Clayton
Mental Health Not Good 15.1% 21.5%
Physical Health Not Good 11.1% 15.6%
Depression 15.8% 28.8%
Smoking 10.5% 26.6%
Binge Drinking 17.4% 14.4%
Obesity 24.9% 40.2%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 37.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Chula vista vs Clayton

  • In Clayton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.5% compared to 15.1% in Chula vista.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Clayton at 28.8% versus 15.8% in Chula vista.
  • Clayton has a higher smoking rate at 26.6% compared to 10.5% in Chula vista.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Chula vista at 17.4% compared to 14.4% in Clayton.
  • Clayton has higher obesity rates at 40.2% compared to 24.9% in Chula vista.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clayton at 37.0% compared to 9.0% in Chula vista.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Chula vista Clayton
No Schooling 1.7% (4,667) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 11.7% (32,545) 37.5% (208)
Less than High School 18.1% (50,584) 19.5% (108)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 20.4% (56,958) 6.7% (37)

Education Levels Comparison: Chula vista vs Clayton

  • A higher percentage of residents in Chula vista have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
  • In Clayton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 37.5% compared to 11.7% in Chula vista.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clayton at 19.5%, compared to 18.1% in Chula vista.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Chula vista hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.4% compared to 6.7% in Clayton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.