Demographics details for Charleston, IL vs San angelo, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Charleston, IL vs San angelo, TX.
| Data | Charleston | San angelo |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,119 | 99,112 |
| Median Age | 29.4 years | 34.7 years |
| Median Income | $47,533 | $65,040 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Charleston vs San angelo
- The population in San angelo is higher at 99,112, compared to 17,119 in Charleston.
- The median age in San angelo is higher at 34.7 years, compared to 29.4 years in Charleston.
- San angelo has a higher median income of $65,040, compared to $47,533 in Charleston.
- In San angelo, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 32.0% in Charleston.
- Charleston has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 13% in San angelo.
- The unemployment rate in Charleston is higher at 5.3%, compared to 4.1% in San angelo.
Demographics
Demographics Charleston vs San angelo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Charleston | San angelo |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 5 |
| White | 83 | 33 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 44 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 16 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Charleston vs San angelo
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Charleston at 8% compared to 5% in San angelo.
- Charleston has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 33% in San angelo.
- The Asian population is larger in Charleston at 2% compared to 1% in San angelo.
- San angelo has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 44%, compared to 4% in Charleston.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in San angelo at 16%, compared to 3% in Charleston.
- In San angelo, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Charleston.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Charleston | San angelo |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 17.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 24.2% | 23.9% |
| Smoking | 20.0% | 16.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 18.3% |
| Obesity | 36.5% | 37.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Charleston vs San angelo
- More residents in Charleston report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 17.2% in San angelo.
- Depression is more prevalent in Charleston at 24.2% compared to 23.9% in San angelo.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Charleston at 20.0% compared to 16.3% in San angelo.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in San angelo at 18.3% compared to 16.4% in Charleston.
- San angelo has higher obesity rates at 37.8% compared to 36.5% in Charleston.
- Disability percentages are higher in Charleston at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in San angelo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Charleston | San angelo |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (68) | 1.5% (1,444) |
| High School Diploma | 13.6% (2,331) | 14.0% (13,867) |
| Less than High School | 8.1% (1,387) | 17.7% (17,520) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.3% (3,307) | 15.8% (15,619) |
Education Levels Comparison: Charleston vs San angelo
- In San angelo, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.4% in Charleston.
- In San angelo, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.0% compared to 13.6% in Charleston.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in San angelo at 17.7%, compared to 8.1% in Charleston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Charleston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 15.8% in San angelo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.