Demographics details for Catawba, SC vs Thompsons station, TN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Catawba, SC vs Thompsons station, TN.

Data Catawba Thompsons station
Population 1,439 8,199
Median Age 32.7 years 36.1 years
Median Income $50,920 $116,569
Married Families 33.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 12% 3%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 2.6

Population Comparison: Catawba vs Thompsons station

  • The population in Thompsons station is higher at 8,199, compared to 1,439 in Catawba.
  • The median age in Thompsons station is higher at 36.1 years, compared to 32.7 years in Catawba.
  • Thompsons station has a higher median income of $116,569, compared to $50,920 in Catawba.
  • In Thompsons station, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 33.0% in Catawba.
  • Catawba has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 3% in Thompsons station.
  • The unemployment rate in Catawba is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.6% in Thompsons station.

Demographics

Demographics Catawba vs Thompsons station provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Catawba Thompsons station
Black 23 2
White 63 84
Asian 4 4
Hispanic 6 1
Two or More Races 4 11
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Catawba vs Thompsons station

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Catawba at 23% compared to 2% in Thompsons station.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Thompsons station at 84% compared to 63% in Catawba.
  • Both Catawba and Thompsons station have the same percentage of Asian residents at 4%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Catawba at 6% compared to 1% in Thompsons station.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Thompsons station at 11%, compared to 4% in Catawba.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Catawba and Thompsons station at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Catawba Thompsons station
Mental Health Not Good 17.4% 15.1%
Physical Health Not Good 11.6% 9.3%
Depression 22.2% 24.3%
Smoking 17.0% 13.5%
Binge Drinking 18.3% 17.0%
Obesity 34.8% 29.2%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 5.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Catawba vs Thompsons station

  • More residents in Catawba report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 15.1% in Thompsons station.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Thompsons station at 24.3% versus 22.2% in Catawba.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Catawba at 17.0% compared to 13.5% in Thompsons station.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Catawba at 18.3% compared to 17.0% in Thompsons station.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Catawba at 34.8% compared to 29.2% in Thompsons station.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Catawba at 13.0% compared to 5.0% in Thompsons station.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Catawba Thompsons station
No Schooling 0.1% (1) 0.6% (51)
High School Diploma 11.5% (166) 11.2% (920)
Less than High School 15.7% (226) 4.1% (340)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.5% (310) 33.2% (2,725)

Education Levels Comparison: Catawba vs Thompsons station

  • In Thompsons station, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.1% in Catawba.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Catawba hold a high school diploma at 11.5% compared to 11.2% in Thompsons station.
  • More residents in Catawba have less than a high school education at 15.7% compared to 4.1% in Thompsons station.
  • In Thompsons station, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.2% compared to 21.5% in Catawba.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.