Demographics details for Castle rock, CO vs Carrboro, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Castle rock, CO vs Carrboro, NC.
Data | Castle rock | Carrboro |
---|---|---|
Population | 80,191 | 21,298 |
Median Age | 35.8 years | 33.1 years |
Median Income | $135,985 | $76,933 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 2% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Castle rock vs Carrboro
- In Castle rock, the population is higher at 80,191, compared to 21,298 in Carrboro.
- Residents in Castle rock have a higher median age of 35.8 years compared to 33.1 years in Carrboro.
- Castle rock has a higher median income of $135,985 compared to $76,933 in Carrboro.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Castle rock at 44.0% compared to 38.0% in Carrboro.
- The poverty level is higher in Carrboro at 12%, compared to 2% in Castle rock.
- The unemployment rate in Castle rock is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.5% in Carrboro.
Demographics
Demographics Castle rock vs Carrboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Castle rock | Carrboro |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 14 |
White | 81 | 61 |
Asian | 2 | 9 |
Hispanic | 10 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Castle rock vs Carrboro
- In Carrboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 14% compared to 1% in Castle rock.
- Castle rock has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 61% in Carrboro.
- In Carrboro, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 2% in Castle rock.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Castle rock at 10% compared to 8% in Carrboro.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Carrboro at 7%, compared to 6% in Castle rock.
- In Carrboro, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Castle rock.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Castle rock | Carrboro |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.3% | 13.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 8.2% |
Depression | 19.6% | 20.5% |
Smoking | 10.4% | 10.3% |
Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 17.5% |
Obesity | 24.3% | 27.4% |
Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Castle rock vs Carrboro
- More residents in Castle rock report poor mental health at 13.3% compared to 13.0% in Carrboro.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Carrboro at 20.5% versus 19.6% in Castle rock.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Castle rock at 10.4% compared to 10.3% in Carrboro.
- Binge drinking is more common in Castle rock at 18.9% compared to 17.5% in Carrboro.
- Carrboro has higher obesity rates at 27.4% compared to 24.3% in Castle rock.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Carrboro at 8.0% compared to 6.0% in Castle rock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Castle rock | Carrboro |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (142) | 1.3% (273) |
High School Diploma | 6.7% (5,389) | 4.1% (868) |
Less than High School | 2.8% (2,284) | 4.6% (984) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.8% (25,532) | 46.7% (9,945) |
Education Levels Comparison: Castle rock vs Carrboro
- In Carrboro, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.2% in Castle rock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Castle rock hold a high school diploma at 6.7% compared to 4.1% in Carrboro.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Carrboro at 4.6%, compared to 2.8% in Castle rock.
- In Carrboro, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 46.7% compared to 31.8% in Castle rock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.