Demographics details for Burnham, PA vs Danville, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Burnham, PA vs Danville, IL.
| Data | Burnham | Danville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,972 | 28,472 |
| Median Age | 41.1 years | 38.6 years |
| Median Income | $58,929 | $42,424 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 8.6 |
Population Comparison: Burnham vs Danville
- The population in Danville is higher at 28,472, compared to 1,972 in Burnham.
- Residents in Burnham have a higher median age of 41.1 years compared to 38.6 years in Danville.
- Burnham has a higher median income of $58,929 compared to $42,424 in Danville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Burnham at 36.0% compared to 25.0% in Danville.
- The poverty level is higher in Danville at 20%, compared to 14% in Burnham.
- Danville has a higher unemployment rate at 8.6% compared to 5.5% in Burnham.
Demographics
Demographics Burnham vs Danville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Burnham | Danville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 34 |
| White | 94 | 52 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Burnham vs Danville
- In Danville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 34% compared to 3% in Burnham.
- Burnham has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 52% in Danville.
- In Danville, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Burnham.
- Danville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 0% in Burnham.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Danville at 5%, compared to 3% in Burnham.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Burnham and Danville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Burnham | Danville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 14.5% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 21.2% |
| Smoking | 22.4% | 23.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 35.5% | 41.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Burnham vs Danville
- In Danville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 18.1% in Burnham.
- Depression is more prevalent in Burnham at 24.6% compared to 21.2% in Danville.
- Danville has a higher smoking rate at 23.9% compared to 22.4% in Burnham.
- Binge drinking is more common in Burnham at 18.3% compared to 14.9% in Danville.
- Danville has higher obesity rates at 41.4% compared to 35.5% in Burnham.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Danville at 17.0% compared to 11.0% in Burnham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Burnham | Danville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (5) | 0.9% (270) |
| High School Diploma | 27.1% (535) | 20.6% (5,853) |
| Less than High School | 4.1% (80) | 13.1% (3,727) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.5% (147) | 11.7% (3,344) |
Education Levels Comparison: Burnham vs Danville
- In Danville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.3% in Burnham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Burnham hold a high school diploma at 27.1% compared to 20.6% in Danville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Danville at 13.1%, compared to 4.1% in Burnham.
- In Danville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.7% compared to 7.5% in Burnham.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.