Demographics details for Beaver dam, WI vs Susanville, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Beaver dam, WI vs Susanville, CA.

Data Beaver dam Susanville
Population 16,582 13,707
Median Age 40.4 years 33.7 years
Median Income $65,802 $52,997
Married Families 35.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 13%
Unemployment Rate 3.1 7.0

Population Comparison: Beaver dam vs Susanville

  • In Beaver dam, the population is higher at 16,582, compared to 13,707 in Susanville.
  • Residents in Beaver dam have a higher median age of 40.4 years compared to 33.7 years in Susanville.
  • Beaver dam has a higher median income of $65,802 compared to $52,997 in Susanville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Beaver dam at 35.0% compared to 33.0% in Susanville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Susanville at 13%, compared to 0% in Beaver dam.
  • Susanville has a higher unemployment rate at 7.0% compared to 3.1% in Beaver dam.

Demographics

Demographics Beaver dam vs Susanville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Beaver dam Susanville
Black 3 16
White 81 29
Asian 2 2
Hispanic 8 33
Two or More Races 6 17
American Indian Data is updating 3

Demographics Comparison: Beaver dam vs Susanville

  • In Susanville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 16% compared to 3% in Beaver dam.
  • Beaver dam has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 29% in Susanville.
  • Both Beaver dam and Susanville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
  • Susanville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 33%, compared to 8% in Beaver dam.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Susanville at 17%, compared to 6% in Beaver dam.
  • In Susanville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Beaver dam.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Beaver dam Susanville
Mental Health Not Good 15.7% 16.9%
Physical Health Not Good 10.6% 13.1%
Depression 23.6% 18.1%
Smoking 17.6% 17.9%
Binge Drinking 23.5% 18.5%
Obesity 36.6% 32.9%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Beaver dam vs Susanville

  • In Susanville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 15.7% in Beaver dam.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Beaver dam at 23.6% compared to 18.1% in Susanville.
  • Susanville has a higher smoking rate at 17.9% compared to 17.6% in Beaver dam.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Beaver dam at 23.5% compared to 18.5% in Susanville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Beaver dam at 36.6% compared to 32.9% in Susanville.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Beaver dam at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Susanville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Beaver dam Susanville
No Schooling 0.3% (47) 1.2% (170)
High School Diploma 23.8% (3,947) 19.1% (2,613)
Less than High School 10.3% (1,706) 39.3% (5,387)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.2% (3,023) 7.0% (962)

Education Levels Comparison: Beaver dam vs Susanville

  • In Susanville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.3% in Beaver dam.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Beaver dam hold a high school diploma at 23.8% compared to 19.1% in Susanville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Susanville at 39.3%, compared to 10.3% in Beaver dam.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Beaver dam hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.2% compared to 7.0% in Susanville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.