Demographics details for Austin, TX vs Little falls, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Austin, TX vs Little falls, MN.
| Data | Austin | Little falls |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 974,447 | 9,094 |
| Median Age | 34.2 years | 40.8 years |
| Median Income | $86,556 | $44,455 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Austin vs Little falls
- In Austin, the population is higher at 974,447, compared to 9,094 in Little falls.
- The median age in Little falls is higher at 40.8 years, compared to 34.2 years in Austin.
- Austin has a higher median income of $86,556 compared to $44,455 in Little falls.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Austin at 35.0% compared to 34.0% in Little falls.
- Austin has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 11% in Little falls.
- Little falls has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Austin.
Demographics
Demographics Austin vs Little falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Austin | Little falls |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | Data is updating |
| White | 40 | 95 |
| Asian | 8 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 32 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Austin vs Little falls
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Austin at 8% compared to 0% in Little falls.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Little falls at 95% compared to 40% in Austin.
- The Asian population is larger in Austin at 8% compared to 1% in Little falls.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Austin at 32% compared to 1% in Little falls.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Austin at 11% compared to 3% in Little falls.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Austin at 1% compared to 0% in Little falls.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Austin | Little falls |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.8% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 21.1% | 25.0% |
| Smoking | 11.2% | 22.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.4% | 20.6% |
| Obesity | 28.8% | 38.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Austin vs Little falls
- In Little falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 15.2% in Austin.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Little falls at 25.0% versus 21.1% in Austin.
- Little falls has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 11.2% in Austin.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Little falls at 20.6% compared to 19.4% in Austin.
- Little falls has higher obesity rates at 38.5% compared to 28.8% in Austin.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Little falls at 17.0% compared to 8.0% in Austin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Austin | Little falls |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (14,322) | 0.7% (63) |
| High School Diploma | 7.8% (75,894) | 25.4% (2,308) |
| Less than High School | 11.4% (110,985) | 11.7% (1,063) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 39.3% (382,604) | 14.3% (1,301) |
Education Levels Comparison: Austin vs Little falls
- A higher percentage of residents in Austin have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.7% in Little falls.
- In Little falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.4% compared to 7.8% in Austin.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Little falls at 11.7%, compared to 11.4% in Austin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Austin hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.3% compared to 14.3% in Little falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.