Demographics details for Aberdeen, WA vs Gresham, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Aberdeen, WA vs Gresham, OR.
| Data | Aberdeen | Gresham |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,113 | 111,621 |
| Median Age | 37.1 years | 37.3 years |
| Median Income | $50,008 | $69,437 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Aberdeen vs Gresham
- The population in Gresham is higher at 111,621, compared to 17,113 in Aberdeen.
- The median age in Gresham is higher at 37.3 years, compared to 37.1 years in Aberdeen.
- Gresham has a higher median income of $69,437, compared to $50,008 in Aberdeen.
- In Gresham, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 29.0% in Aberdeen.
- Aberdeen has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 13% in Gresham.
- The unemployment rate in Aberdeen is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.9% in Gresham.
Demographics
Demographics Aberdeen vs Gresham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Aberdeen | Gresham |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 4 |
| White | 63 | 55 |
| Asian | 1 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 21 | 22 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 13 |
| American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Aberdeen vs Gresham
- In Gresham, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 1% in Aberdeen.
- Aberdeen has a higher percentage of White residents at 63% compared to 55% in Gresham.
- In Gresham, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Aberdeen.
- Gresham has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 22%, compared to 21% in Aberdeen.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gresham at 13%, compared to 12% in Aberdeen.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Aberdeen at 2% compared to 1% in Gresham.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Aberdeen | Gresham |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.2% | 20.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.2% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 29.4% | 28.4% |
| Smoking | 19.2% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 20.2% |
| Obesity | 35.6% | 28.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Aberdeen vs Gresham
- More residents in Aberdeen report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 20.0% in Gresham.
- Depression is more prevalent in Aberdeen at 29.4% compared to 28.4% in Gresham.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Aberdeen at 19.2% compared to 17.6% in Gresham.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gresham at 20.2% compared to 16.0% in Aberdeen.
- Obesity rates are higher in Aberdeen at 35.6% compared to 28.6% in Gresham.
- Disability percentages are higher in Aberdeen at 22.0% compared to 15.0% in Gresham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Aberdeen | Gresham |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (261) | 1.6% (1,757) |
| High School Diploma | 15.7% (2,683) | 15.0% (16,776) |
| Less than High School | 19.2% (3,285) | 16.5% (18,399) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.8% (1,840) | 16.2% (18,082) |
Education Levels Comparison: Aberdeen vs Gresham
- In Gresham, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 1.5% in Aberdeen.
- A higher percentage of residents in Aberdeen hold a high school diploma at 15.7% compared to 15.0% in Gresham.
- More residents in Aberdeen have less than a high school education at 19.2% compared to 16.5% in Gresham.
- In Gresham, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 10.8% in Aberdeen.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.