Demographics details for Rockford, IA vs Siloam springs, AR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Rockford, IA vs Siloam springs, AR.

Data Rockford Siloam springs
Population 743 18,654
Median Age 41.4 years 30.1 years
Median Income $61,741 $59,911
Married Families 52.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 6% 13%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Rockford vs Siloam springs

  • The population in Siloam springs is higher at 18,654, compared to 743 in Rockford.
  • Residents in Rockford have a higher median age of 41.4 years compared to 30.1 years in Siloam springs.
  • Rockford has a higher median income of $61,741 compared to $59,911 in Siloam springs.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Rockford at 52.0% compared to 38.0% in Siloam springs.
  • The poverty level is higher in Siloam springs at 13%, compared to 6% in Rockford.
  • Siloam springs has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Rockford.

Demographics

Demographics Rockford vs Siloam springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Rockford Siloam springs
Black Data is updating 1
White 89 50
Asian Data is updating 3
Hispanic 5 23
Two or More Races 4 20
American Indian 2 3

Demographics Comparison: Rockford vs Siloam springs

  • In Siloam springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Rockford.
  • Rockford has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 50% in Siloam springs.
  • In Siloam springs, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Rockford.
  • Siloam springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 5% in Rockford.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Siloam springs at 20%, compared to 4% in Rockford.
  • In Siloam springs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 2% in Rockford.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Rockford Siloam springs
Mental Health Not Good 15.4% 20.0%
Physical Health Not Good 9.6% 15.0%
Depression 19.0% 26.0%
Smoking 17.3% 21.6%
Binge Drinking 21.9% 14.9%
Obesity 37.9% 39.2%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Rockford vs Siloam springs

  • In Siloam springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 15.4% in Rockford.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Siloam springs at 26.0% versus 19.0% in Rockford.
  • Siloam springs has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 17.3% in Rockford.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Rockford at 21.9% compared to 14.9% in Siloam springs.
  • Siloam springs has higher obesity rates at 39.2% compared to 37.9% in Rockford.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Rockford at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Siloam springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Rockford Siloam springs
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 3.7% (681)
High School Diploma 22.9% (170) 13.5% (2,510)
Less than High School 13.1% (97) 17.4% (3,249)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.5% (130) 14.4% (2,680)

Education Levels Comparison: Rockford vs Siloam springs

  • In Siloam springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 0.0% in Rockford.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Rockford hold a high school diploma at 22.9% compared to 13.5% in Siloam springs.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Siloam springs at 17.4%, compared to 13.1% in Rockford.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Rockford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.5% compared to 14.4% in Siloam springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.