Demographics details for Richmond, MI vs Lafayette, LA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Richmond, MI vs Lafayette, LA.

Data Richmond Lafayette
Population 5,817 121,389
Median Age 38.7 years 36.9 years
Median Income $64,154 $58,850
Married Families 29.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 9% 18%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 4.1

Population Comparison: Richmond vs Lafayette

  • The population in Lafayette is higher at 121,389, compared to 5,817 in Richmond.
  • Residents in Richmond have a higher median age of 38.7 years compared to 36.9 years in Lafayette.
  • Richmond has a higher median income of $64,154 compared to $58,850 in Lafayette.
  • In Lafayette, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 29.0% in Richmond.
  • The poverty level is higher in Lafayette at 18%, compared to 9% in Richmond.
  • The unemployment rate in Richmond is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.1% in Lafayette.

Demographics

Demographics Richmond vs Lafayette provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Richmond Lafayette
Black 4 29
White 87 58
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic 5 5
Two or More Races 4 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Richmond vs Lafayette

  • In Lafayette, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 4% in Richmond.
  • Richmond has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 58% in Lafayette.
  • In Lafayette, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Richmond.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Richmond and Lafayette at 5%.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lafayette at 6%, compared to 4% in Richmond.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Richmond and Lafayette at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Richmond Lafayette
Mental Health Not Good 18.4% 18.3%
Physical Health Not Good 11.7% 12.3%
Depression 26.6% 26.4%
Smoking 20.5% 20.0%
Binge Drinking 18.7% 18.9%
Obesity 37.8% 40.0%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Richmond vs Lafayette

  • More residents in Richmond report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 18.3% in Lafayette.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Richmond at 26.6% compared to 26.4% in Lafayette.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Richmond at 20.5% compared to 20.0% in Lafayette.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Lafayette at 18.9% compared to 18.7% in Richmond.
  • Lafayette has higher obesity rates at 40.0% compared to 37.8% in Richmond.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Richmond at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Lafayette.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Richmond Lafayette
No Schooling 0.5% (28) 0.7% (803)
High School Diploma 18.5% (1,077) 14.8% (17,954)
Less than High School 14.9% (865) 8.9% (10,815)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.8% (920) 27.4% (33,262)

Education Levels Comparison: Richmond vs Lafayette

  • In Lafayette, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Richmond.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Richmond hold a high school diploma at 18.5% compared to 14.8% in Lafayette.
  • More residents in Richmond have less than a high school education at 14.9% compared to 8.9% in Lafayette.
  • In Lafayette, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.4% compared to 15.8% in Richmond.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.