Demographics details for Heppner, OR vs Union city, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Heppner, OR vs Union city, GA.
| Data | Heppner | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,172 | 27,895 |
| Median Age | 39.1 years | 32.7 years |
| Median Income | $46,708 | $46,696 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 17.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 6.1 |
Population Comparison: Heppner vs Union city
- The population in Union city is higher at 27,895, compared to 1,172 in Heppner.
- Residents in Heppner have a higher median age of 39.1 years compared to 32.7 years in Union city.
- Heppner has a higher median income of $46,708 compared to $46,696 in Union city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Heppner at 43.0% compared to 17.0% in Union city.
- The poverty level is higher in Union city at 16%, compared to 10% in Heppner.
- Union city has a higher unemployment rate at 6.1% compared to 5.7% in Heppner.
Demographics
Demographics Heppner vs Union city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Heppner | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 85 |
| White | 86 | 6 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Heppner vs Union city
- In Union city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 85% compared to 1% in Heppner.
- Heppner has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 6% in Union city.
- Both Heppner and Union city have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Heppner at 6% compared to 5% in Union city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Heppner at 7% compared to 4% in Union city.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Heppner and Union city at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Heppner | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 27.6% | 17.2% |
| Smoking | 16.2% | 18.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 13.5% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 35.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Heppner vs Union city
- More residents in Heppner report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 16.7% in Union city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Heppner at 27.6% compared to 17.2% in Union city.
- Union city has a higher smoking rate at 18.0% compared to 16.2% in Heppner.
- Binge drinking is more common in Heppner at 18.2% compared to 13.5% in Union city.
- Union city has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 34.4% in Heppner.
- Disability percentages are higher in Heppner at 35.0% compared to 12.0% in Union city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Heppner | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.5% (129) |
| High School Diploma | 22.0% (258) | 13.2% (3,681) |
| Less than High School | 9.4% (110) | 7.8% (2,166) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.8% (115) | 17.3% (4,828) |
Education Levels Comparison: Heppner vs Union city
- In Union city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Heppner.
- A higher percentage of residents in Heppner hold a high school diploma at 22.0% compared to 13.2% in Union city.
- More residents in Heppner have less than a high school education at 9.4% compared to 7.8% in Union city.
- In Union city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 9.8% in Heppner.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.