Demographics details for Fair haven, VT vs Tuscaloosa, AL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fair haven, VT vs Tuscaloosa, AL.

Data Fair haven Tuscaloosa
Population 2,573 110,602
Median Age 36.0 years 28.8 years
Median Income $60,000 $47,257
Married Families 55.0% 26.0%
Poverty Level 10% 21%
Unemployment Rate 2.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Fair haven vs Tuscaloosa

  • The population in Tuscaloosa is higher at 110,602, compared to 2,573 in Fair haven.
  • Residents in Fair haven have a higher median age of 36.0 years compared to 28.8 years in Tuscaloosa.
  • Fair haven has a higher median income of $60,000 compared to $47,257 in Tuscaloosa.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fair haven at 55.0% compared to 26.0% in Tuscaloosa.
  • The poverty level is higher in Tuscaloosa at 21%, compared to 10% in Fair haven.
  • Tuscaloosa has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.2% in Fair haven.

Demographics

Demographics Fair haven vs Tuscaloosa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fair haven Tuscaloosa
Black Data is updating 41
White 95 49
Asian 2 3
Hispanic 1 4
Two or More Races 2 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fair haven vs Tuscaloosa

  • In Tuscaloosa, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 41% compared to 0% in Fair haven.
  • Fair haven has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 49% in Tuscaloosa.
  • In Tuscaloosa, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Fair haven.
  • Tuscaloosa has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 1% in Fair haven.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Tuscaloosa at 3%, compared to 2% in Fair haven.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fair haven and Tuscaloosa at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fair haven Tuscaloosa
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 19.5%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 13.6%
Depression Data is updating% 21.9%
Smoking Data is updating% 19.6%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 14.4%
Obesity Data is updating% 44.5%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fair haven vs Tuscaloosa

  • In Tuscaloosa, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 0.0% in Fair haven.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Tuscaloosa at 21.9% versus 0.0% in Fair haven.
  • Tuscaloosa has a higher smoking rate at 19.6% compared to 0.0% in Fair haven.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Tuscaloosa at 14.4% compared to 0.0% in Fair haven.
  • Tuscaloosa has higher obesity rates at 44.5% compared to 0.0% in Fair haven.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Tuscaloosa at 9.0% compared to 0.0% in Fair haven.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fair haven Tuscaloosa
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.7% (721)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 12.5% (13,878)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 6.1% (6,781)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 20.3% (22,425)

Education Levels Comparison: Fair haven vs Tuscaloosa

  • In Tuscaloosa, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Fair haven.
  • In Tuscaloosa, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.5% compared to 0.0% in Fair haven.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tuscaloosa at 6.1%, compared to 0.0% in Fair haven.
  • In Tuscaloosa, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.3% compared to 0.0% in Fair haven.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.