Demographics details for Craig, CO vs Coalinga, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Craig, CO vs Coalinga, CA.
| Data | Craig | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,970 | 17,024 |
| Median Age | 37.4 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $52,443 | $68,976 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Craig vs Coalinga
- The population in Coalinga is higher at 17,024, compared to 8,970 in Craig.
- Residents in Craig have a higher median age of 37.4 years compared to 35.0 years in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has a higher median income of $68,976, compared to $52,443 in Craig.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Craig at 38.0% compared to 31.0% in Coalinga.
- The poverty level is higher in Coalinga at 15%, compared to 10% in Craig.
- Coalinga has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 4.5% in Craig.
Demographics
Demographics Craig vs Coalinga provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Craig | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 4 |
| White | 71 | 9 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 65 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 18 |
| American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Craig vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in Craig.
- Craig has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 9% in Coalinga.
- In Coalinga, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Craig.
- Coalinga has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 65%, compared to 17% in Craig.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Coalinga at 18%, compared to 11% in Craig.
- In Coalinga, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Craig.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Craig | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 23.9% | 16.4% |
| Smoking | 18.9% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.0% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 28.2% | 39.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Craig vs Coalinga
- More residents in Craig report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 16.9% in Coalinga.
- Depression is more prevalent in Craig at 23.9% compared to 16.4% in Coalinga.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Craig at 18.9% compared to 17.2% in Coalinga.
- Binge drinking is more common in Craig at 19.0% compared to 15.9% in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has higher obesity rates at 39.1% compared to 28.2% in Craig.
- Disability percentages are higher in Craig at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Coalinga.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Craig | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (52) | 3.2% (537) |
| High School Diploma | 24.1% (2,164) | 13.8% (2,349) |
| Less than High School | 11.0% (990) | 39.2% (6,672) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.9% (1,338) | 8.1% (1,380) |
Education Levels Comparison: Craig vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.6% in Craig.
- A higher percentage of residents in Craig hold a high school diploma at 24.1% compared to 13.8% in Coalinga.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Coalinga at 39.2%, compared to 11.0% in Craig.
- A higher percentage of residents in Craig hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.9% compared to 8.1% in Coalinga.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.