Demographics details for Centralia, IL vs Folsom, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Centralia, IL vs Folsom, CA.
| Data | Centralia | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,931 | 83,269 |
| Median Age | 40.7 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $46,468 | $134,935 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Centralia vs Folsom
- The population in Folsom is higher at 83,269, compared to 11,931 in Centralia.
- Residents in Centralia have a higher median age of 40.7 years compared to 39.9 years in Folsom.
- Folsom has a higher median income of $134,935, compared to $46,468 in Centralia.
- In Folsom, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 33.0% in Centralia.
- Centralia has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 7% in Folsom.
- The unemployment rate in Centralia is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.8% in Folsom.
Demographics
Demographics Centralia vs Folsom provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Centralia | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 4 |
| White | 79 | 54 |
| Asian | 2 | 18 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 14 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Centralia vs Folsom
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Centralia at 10% compared to 4% in Folsom.
- Centralia has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 54% in Folsom.
- In Folsom, the Asian population stands at 18%, greater than 2% in Centralia.
- Folsom has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 4% in Centralia.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Folsom at 10%, compared to 5% in Centralia.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Centralia and Folsom at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Centralia | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 13.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 8.4% |
| Depression | 23.9% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 22.7% | 9.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 41.1% | 28.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Centralia vs Folsom
- More residents in Centralia report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 13.9% in Folsom.
- Depression is more prevalent in Centralia at 23.9% compared to 17.7% in Folsom.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Centralia at 22.7% compared to 9.5% in Folsom.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Folsom at 17.8% compared to 16.4% in Centralia.
- Obesity rates are higher in Centralia at 41.1% compared to 28.0% in Folsom.
- Disability percentages are higher in Centralia at 22.0% compared to 7.0% in Folsom.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Centralia | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (72) | 0.5% (451) |
| High School Diploma | 18.8% (2,243) | 7.7% (6,439) |
| Less than High School | 13.7% (1,638) | 6.1% (5,119) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.5% (1,494) | 36.4% (30,311) |
Education Levels Comparison: Centralia vs Folsom
- A higher percentage of residents in Centralia have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Folsom.
- A higher percentage of residents in Centralia hold a high school diploma at 18.8% compared to 7.7% in Folsom.
- More residents in Centralia have less than a high school education at 13.7% compared to 6.1% in Folsom.
- In Folsom, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.4% compared to 12.5% in Centralia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.