Demographics details for Cawker city, KS vs Lancaster, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cawker city, KS vs Lancaster, CA.
| Data | Cawker city | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 455 | 169,185 |
| Median Age | 49.2 years | 33.6 years |
| Median Income | $48,667 | $71,367 |
| Married Families | 49.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 8.2 |
Population Comparison: Cawker city vs Lancaster
- The population in Lancaster is higher at 169,185, compared to 455 in Cawker city.
- Residents in Cawker city have a higher median age of 49.2 years compared to 33.6 years in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher median income of $71,367, compared to $48,667 in Cawker city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cawker city at 49.0% compared to 32.0% in Lancaster.
- The poverty level is higher in Lancaster at 15%, compared to 10% in Cawker city.
- Lancaster has a higher unemployment rate at 8.2% compared to 2.5% in Cawker city.
Demographics
Demographics Cawker city vs Lancaster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cawker city | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 21 |
| White | 89 | 10 |
| Asian | 6 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 46 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 18 |
| American Indian | 3 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Cawker city vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 21% compared to 0% in Cawker city.
- Cawker city has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 10% in Lancaster.
- The Asian population is larger in Cawker city at 6% compared to 4% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 46%, compared to 2% in Cawker city.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lancaster at 18%, compared to 0% in Cawker city.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Cawker city at 3% compared to 1% in Lancaster.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cawker city | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 21.0% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 17.9% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.0% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cawker city vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 15.6% in Cawker city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cawker city at 21.0% compared to 17.7% in Lancaster.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cawker city at 17.9% compared to 14.8% in Lancaster.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cawker city at 20.0% compared to 15.1% in Lancaster.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cawker city at 38.5% compared to 32.9% in Lancaster.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cawker city at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Lancaster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cawker city | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.4% (11) | 2.0% (3,403) |
| High School Diploma | 22.2% (101) | 17.5% (29,555) |
| Less than High School | 14.1% (64) | 21.5% (36,421) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.5% (48) | 12.3% (20,861) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cawker city vs Lancaster
- A higher percentage of residents in Cawker city have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 2.0% in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cawker city hold a high school diploma at 22.2% compared to 17.5% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lancaster at 21.5%, compared to 14.1% in Cawker city.
- In Lancaster, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.3% compared to 10.5% in Cawker city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.